When You Agree to a Debate that Won’t Be Fact-checked

It’s Your Word Against His

The VP debate, one week ago, had a moment when the CBS moderators chose to do what they initially pledged not to do: fact-check either candidate. J.D. Vance took exception when they called him out on the Haitian immigrant lie that they were ‘illegal’. That’s how politicians hope to get away with viewpoints that aren’t entirely truthful. Supposedly, the other candidate is meant to do the fact-checking, instead.

Let’s face it: in the middle of a debate, who has time to constantly argue against the other person’s words? Trump in his debate with Kamala Harris was later accused of lying 30 times!

It’s so insidious: lies have a way of catching the perpetrator out, in the end, but the damage has already been done. Springfield, Ohio, will never be the same again.

Sure they are.

Unknown's avatar

About cdsmiller17

I am an Astrologer who also writes about world events. My first eBook "At This Point in Time" is available through most on-line book stores. I have now serialized my second book "The Star of Bethlehem" here.
This entry was posted in history and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to When You Agree to a Debate that Won’t Be Fact-checked

  1. Pingback: It Took Me an Extra Day to Track This Idiom Down: | cdsmiller17

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.