Sometimes, a Hunch is More than a Hunch

Is Rupert Spira the Second Coming of Jesus Christ?

This is going to sound weird, but it was that little *ping* that went off when I saw that Rupert Spira’s Uranus was @ 17° Leo 40′. A-ha.

It’s exactly opposite Jesus’ natal position of Mars @ 17° Aquarius 36′. So I decided to look at their karmic relationship, based on comparing Rupert’s birth chart with Jesus’ birth and death charts.

What makes this interesting is that Rupert’s Mars is within 3° of Jesus’ natal Mars, too. Rupert’s Mercury is conjunct Jesus’ natal Saturn, and Rupert’s Part of Fortune is conjunct Jesus’ natal Uranus.

The ‘fatal’ positions in Jesus’ death chart bring even more connections: Rupert’s Venus is conjunct Jesus’ ‘fatal’ Venus; Rupert’s (randomized) Ascendant is conjunct Jesus’ ‘fatal’ Ascendant; and Rupert’s Sun/South Node conjunction is linked to Jesus’ ‘fatal’ Jupiter. They are cosmically connected, perhaps through the oversoul of the Christ.

Let’s Allow Rupert to Speak His Own Truth:

.

.

.

Any questions?

About cdsmiller17

I am an Astrologer who also writes about world events. My first eBook "At This Point in Time" is available through most on-line book stores. I have now serialized my second book "The Star of Bethlehem" here. And I am experimenting with birth and death charts. If you wish to contact me, or request a birth chart, send an email to cdsmiller17@gmail.com. (And, in case you are also interested, I have an extensive list of celebrity birth and death details if you wish to 'confirm' what you suspect may be a past-life experience of yours.) Bless.
This entry was posted in history, spirituality and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Sometimes, a Hunch is More than a Hunch

  1. captmccoy says:

    The Catholics (and Protestants) use Dec 25th as the birth date of Christ. The Orthodox (other Roman church) uses January 7th. Some historians debate that Jesus was actually born in the Spring, citing scripture that refers to shepherds with their flocks in the field.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. captmccoy says:

    I get the feeling there was some effort to cover the real birth date up. Possibly even change it so someone could be an imposter in the future, by the Romans who instituted the religion to keep from being destroyed by it. In the 4th Century the Romans playing the gods were fearing the increasing popularity of Christianity to the point they had ceased the persecutions.

    Liked by 1 person

    • cdsmiller17 says:

      The whole disguising of birth data, etc., is classic control stuff. I began my research in the spring of 1996, writing “The Star of Bethlehem” manuscript during that summer. I serialized the chapters here on WordPress in 2016. Over time, I have seen that I was on a track that led me to a Gnostic Christ figure. The astrology details were carefully researched (including the Jupiter/Saturn triple conjunction that happened in 7 BCE). Edgar Cayce’s Source nailed the date to January 6th (NS?), but even so, my computer insisted that the NS was January 4th. In the end, the story was told to the Jewish people in the New Testament to confirm that Titus was the reincarnation of Jesus, and therefore, the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem (in 70 CE) was confirmation of the prediction of Jesus’ second coming. I may have taken part in that event, in a past life. “Let me take you down, ’cause I’m going to Strawberry Fields, where nothing is real, and nothing to get hung about…” (The Beatles).

      Liked by 2 people

  3. captmccoy says:

    Somehow I doubt Jesus was reincarnated as Titus. It’s great to see how the thread of reincarnation has been carried through history; used by the rulers and hidden from the masses.

    Liked by 2 people

    • cdsmiller17 says:

      Now that’s rich coming from you, since you have managed to link villains from the more recent past with subsequent victims of hidden ‘controllers’. The reincarnational research I’ve done shows the most unlikely links. But I was trying to demonstrate with this post that the connections between individuals are astrological in fact. Otherwise, why is one person different from the next, even when born on the same day? 1,440 minutes each day.

      Liked by 2 people

      • captmccoy says:

        True, it is possible, but I worked on Titus’ chart at some point. I’ll see if I can dig it up.

        Like

      • cdsmiller17 says:

        I embedded a link to my post about Titus in my previous reply, but you mustn’t have clicked on it. Titus was born December 30, 39 AD (OS) which equates to December 28 (NS). This makes him more likely to be the ‘model’ for the Roman Catholic Church’s “Messiah”.

        Liked by 1 person

      • captmccoy says:

        Generally speaking, the souls they consider enemies they want to turn, they use in crime. The point is to destroy or “dirty up” that soul so they won’t be a problem in the future. Those they put in high office or have reborn as royalty and then groom, are already trusted. That’s like Hugo Chavez (https://4dforum.org/case-study-41/ ). Notice how his life was set up and mimics that of the rise of Hitler, being in prison for a short time etc. He was not Hitler before, but manipulated or guided in the same way. Being born of low birth but having a meteoric rise offers him the loyalty of common people. Previously he had been a nobleman.

        Like

      • cdsmiller17 says:

        So, this begs the question: why is everything linked to Nazi Germany? And the Knights Templar? https://starlogic.ca/2020/05/30/having-a-bash-at-decoding-a-mystery/

        Liked by 1 person

      • captmccoy says:

        This is my take, I put effort into my blog to show it. The ones who used a big psychic show to set up the Knights Templar were Philip the Fair and Clement V (they also persecuted Jews). Phillip was Abraham, they did the same thing to Soddom and Gomorrah, they did the same thing to Gibeah (Judges 19-21). Abraham, Phillip the Fair and Fromm are the same guy. The real architect of the Third Reich, Why does Abraham hate the Jews? He doesn’t like the original story of Abraham, the one in the Tanakh, that’s been rewritten over and over.

        Like

      • captmccoy says:

        Some Masons believe Jacques du Molay was Jesus

        Liked by 1 person

  4. cdsmiller17 says:

    Since you often refer to Genesis as Bereshit (“in beginning”) I wonder who actually you really support. Abraham is supposedly Father to the Jews, so for him to hate them seems ‘wrong’. However, Jesus implied to the Jewish leaders in his lifetime that their Abraham was the ‘father of lies’, ie Satan. It’s a curious situation for sure. I don’t doubt the effort you’ve put in, just the method of your connections. Not everyone uses astrology as proof, so I’m looking for your slant on things.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.