Context: Is There a Magic Number for Groups?

The Rule of One Hundred and Fifty

From “The Tipping Point”:

Humans socialize in the largest groups of all primates because we are the only animals with brains large enough to handle the complexities of that social arrangement. [Robin] Dunbar has actually developed an equation, which works for most primates, in which he plugs in what he calls the neocortex ratio of a particular species — the size of the neocortex relative to the size of the brain — and the equation spits out the expected maximum group size of the animal. If you plug in the neocortex ratio for Homo sapiens, you get a group estimate of 147.8 — or roughly 150. “The figure of 150 seems to represent the maximum number of individual with whom we can have a genuinely social relationship, the kind of relationship that goes with knowing who they are and how they relate to us. Putting it another way, it’s the number of people you would not feel embarrassed about joining uninvited for a drink if you happened to bump into them in a bar.”

The Power of Context (Part Two) (page 179)

In reality, that would be far too many for me, however it does back up an interesting echo from the Bible: the 144,000 (12 x 12 x 1000) Elect.

[Robin] Dunbar has combed through the anthropological literature and found that the number 150 pops up again and again. For example, he looks at 21 different hunter-gatherer societies for which we have solid historical evidence, from the Walbiri of Australia to the Tauade of New Guinea to the Ammassalik of Greenland to the Ona of Tierra del Guego and found that the average number of people in their villages was 148.4.

Ibid (pages 179-180)

So, not 150, after all: 148.

The number 148 represents the weights on the scales. They can lean to either side: for example, towards development or decline.

Angel Numbers

In other words, the Tipping Point.


About cdsmiller17

I am an Astrologer who also writes about world events. My first eBook "At This Point in Time" is available through most on-line book stores. I have now serialized my second book "The Star of Bethlehem" here. And I am experimenting with birth and death charts. If you wish to contact me, or request a birth chart, send an email to (And, in case you are also interested, I have an extensive list of celebrity birth and death details if you wish to 'confirm' what you suspect may be a past-life experience of yours.) Bless.
This entry was posted in reviews, Science and Mathematics and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Context: Is There a Magic Number for Groups?

  1. cindy smith says:

    good morning cds gotta love the universe and how it ‘leads’ us…i was searching on google this morning to find an old toronto band ‘rose’ after someone sent me a picture of the alliston skyline at 7 a.m. that had a “red sky in the morning” vibe…remembered a lyric from an old old tune of theirs from my high school years….that search led me to your blog (you were on the bus with a band member/) and i subscribed to your wordpress when i saw it was about astrology…the past few weeks astrology seems to be coming at me from all directions so i guess you could say i’ve started to pay attention LOL  it’s now a few hours later and i was just about to watch an encore episode of the astrology film ‘changing of the gods’ (which is based on the tome/book – cosmos and psyche by richard tarnas) and boom, your new post popped in my inbox right after a reminder email from them…how fortuitous!? or is it synchronicity look forward to reading more of your posts,cindy and mike smithbig cedar point, ontario


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.