The Q Document

Reading “Nailed” it becomes obvious how unreliable the Gospels of the New Testament actually are.

In fact, the authors of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John seem to be ignorant of the historical records (as known by Rome) and made up scripture to craft a myth of the man, Jesus. Is this because they had a source document, now called “Q”? Where is this source document? And who wrote it?

Hmm.

Something tells me that this is where I come into the picture. If you reverse engineer the idea of Titus being the second coming of a pacifist Jewish teacher from the beginning half of the first century in the Common Era, you can see why it was considered a satire for the Flavians, whose symbol was the Fish.

Reincarnation was a real possibility, especially in the 1st Century. To suggest that Titus was avenging the death of his previous incarnation by destroying the City of Jerusalem, the Temple and scattering the Jews to the four corners of the world, makes it necessary to ‘invent’ that previous incarnation as Jesus.

But how in hell did that personality take on a life of its own?