The Q Document

Reading “Nailed” it becomes obvious how unreliable the Gospels of the New Testament actually are.

In fact, the authors of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John seem to be ignorant of the historical records (as known by Rome) and made up scripture to craft a myth of the man, Jesus. Is this because they had a source document, now called “Q”? Where is this source document? And who wrote it?

Hmm.

Something tells me that this is where I come into the picture. If you reverse engineer the idea of Titus being the second coming of a pacifist Jewish teacher from the beginning half of the first century in the Common Era, you can see why it was considered a satire for the Flavians, whose symbol was the Fish.

Flavian symbol the fish

The Flavian symbol, often represented as the fish symbol, is a significant emblem in the early Christian history. It is believed to have been used as a secret symbol by early Christians to identify fellow believers during times of persecution. The symbol’s use spread widely in the 3rd and 4th centuries, becoming a common sign of faith among Christians. The fish symbol is an acronym for the Greek phrase “Ιησούς Χριστός, Θεού Υιός, Σωτήρ,” which translates to “Jesus Christ, God’s Son, Savior.” This symbol played a crucial role in the early years of Christianity, helping to convey the faith of early Christians without drawing attention to their beliefs.

Wkikpedia

Reincarnation was a real possibility, especially in the 1st Century. To suggest that Titus was avenging the death of his previous incarnation by destroying the City of Jerusalem, the Temple and scattering the Jews to the four corners of the world, makes it necessary to ‘invent’ that previous incarnation as Jesus.

But how in hell did that personality take on a life of its own?