Title of the One True Cross?

Title-of-the-Cross

In Reverse…

Holy relics, especially in the middle ages, were very lucrative business opportunities. Some would even say: crimes of opportunity.

Here’s one that has a modicum of reality to it. For one thing, there are three versions of the same phrase. Traditionally, the title is supposed to read: ‘Jesus the Nazarene, King of the Jews’ represented by the initials INRI (after the Latin): a mouthful, to be sure. This title, shown above, is more succinct, or maybe the phrase is truncated. “Nazarene” seems to be the prominent word.

The second thing that seems significant is the display in reverse: the front of this document would have faded over time, leaving only the imprint of the lettering. And this would have been especially true if the title was still attached to the wood of the cross.

Faith is a very subjective experience. But, every once in a while, the Universe gives us a glimpse of the truth. This may have been one of those moments.

carnal-aspect-of-crucifixion-tony-mariot-20-638

Unknown's avatar

About cdsmiller17

I am an Astrologer who also writes about world events. My first eBook "At This Point in Time" is available through most on-line book stores. I have now serialized my second book "The Star of Bethlehem" here.
This entry was posted in history, spirituality and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Title of the One True Cross?

  1. cdsmiller17's avatar cdsmiller17 says:

    Just one little quibble: if the title is actually the wood that held the document (or even be the document itself), wouldn’t the impression of the letters be in the correct direction? Or am I missing some salient point? Since the crowd watching the crucifixion were mainly Jews, maybe Pilate had the sentence run from right to left in all three scripts. Otherwise, this is a forgery.

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.