The Worst Kept Secret of an English Royal Birth from 1561

Luke Aaron asked this question yesterday. His reason was the prevalence of vague birth details, especially in the Elizabethan era. It had never occurred to me to try, but that’s why we must keep an open mind about such matters. My rationale? Time is cyclical. What goes around comes around again.
Robert Dudley, 1st Earl of Leicester (September 7, 1534* – September 4, 1588)
Now, as I’d noted before, there seems to be no definite proof that Dudley (Sr)’s birth date is as stated.
There is a popular tradition that Robert Dudley was the same age as Elizabeth I; however, in a letter to William Cecil he denotes 24 June as his birthday, and a 1576 portrait miniature by Nicholas Hilliard gives his age as 44, “so 1532 is the most likely year of his birth” (Adams 2008b)
Wikipedia
But the programmers of my Kepler 7.0 astrology program had his birth chart in there already, but with a different date*. They even knew the time of day, and justified it all by stating that they had his Birth Certificate in hand! Here’s the chart:

See what I mean? Two+ years off the ‘estimated’ and perhaps correct birth time. But my reason for showing this one instead of a different one is the position of Venus. If I were to rectify his chart, this would represent the age at which he fathered a son with Elizabeth (in other words, when he got intimate with her). So, who’s to know?
The Experimental Part of This Post
Here is Francis Bacon’s death chart in combination is Elizabeth’s birth chart and this purported birth chart for Robert Dudley:

What do you think? Is it feasible? (And with Dudley’s chart most likely wrong, does it warrant any further discussion?) Let me know.





























